One key aspect to consider when building machine learning models is the balance of column importance. An overly dominant column may indicate an unbalanced model, potential data leakage, or a risk to the model's robustness in production settings.

But what exactly is column importance? Why does high importance signify imbalance? And how can we address this situation?
Let's explore these questions using a churn model as an example.

Column importance is a technique used in machine learning that assigns a score to input columns based on how useful they are at predicting a target variable. The higher the score, the more significant the column is to the model's decision-making process.

Read more about column importance.

Models with a strong dependence on one feature might face robustness challenges in production. If there's a drift or change in this dominant feature, it could compromise the model's predictive accuracy.

A model that assigns high importance to a single column, for instance, over 50%, can be a red flag. While it might seem beneficial initially, it often indicates an unbalanced model. An overly dominant feature may cause the model to lean too heavily on that feature, reducing its generalization capability. This concern escalates if that feature directly correlates with the target variable, indicating data leakage.

Data leakage refers to the unintentional sharing of information between the test and training datasets. If a feature directly related to the outcome variable is included in the model, it can result in overly optimistic performance estimates.
​Read more about data leakage.

Let's consider a churn model that predicts whether a customer will stop doing business with a company within the next month. If we include a feature like "account status", which could contain values like "active" and "inactive", the model might assign high importance to this feature.

It makes sense! Customers with an "inactive" status are more likely to churn. However, "account status" may not be available at the prediction time in a real-life scenario, and using it for prediction would result in data leakage.

Not necessarily. Having a strong predictor in a model isn't inherently harmful. If we're confident that a dominant feature is stable, unlikely to change drastically in real-world applications, and shows no signs of data leakage, relying on it might be justified. In such scenarios, deploying the model to production becomes a strategic move, tapping into a consistent and trustworthy prediction source.

So, how can we address an imbalanced model and prevent data leakage?
Here are some action items:

Carefully review the features included in the model's attribute query, especially those with high importance. Understand their relationship with the target variable and consider whether they would be available in a real-world scenario at prediction time. If not, it's best to exclude such features.

Ensure the date filters applied to the attribute table only include data that precedes the marker (the date from which the model predicts per entity). Incorporating data beyond this point may lead to data leakage, resulting in overly optimistic model performance. Careful attention to this aspect can prevent any accidental use of future data, thereby helping to maintain the integrity of the predictive model's outcomes.

​

If you find it challenging to restore the feature balance in your model, or if you need further guidance on preventing or mitigating data leakage, remember Pecan team is here for you. We are committed to aiding your success and are more than willing to provide comprehensive support, share intricate insights, and help you overcome any challenges related to feature importance.
Your journey toward achieving a balanced machine-learning model with Pecan is a partnership, and we're here to ensure it's rewarding.

​